Southern Junior Roster 2024 · U16 Girls
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. DiamondBacks U16G | 15 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 54 | 15 | 39 | 40 | 89% |
| 2. University U16G | 15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 43 | 28 | 15 | 29 | 64% |
| 3. Canterbury U16G | 15 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 29 | 26 | 3 | 26 | 58% |
| 4. OHA U16G | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 30 | 38 | -8 | 17 | 38% |
| 5. Derwent U16G | 15 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 53 | -23 | 13 | 29% |
| 6. NWG U16G | 15 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 18 | 44 | -26 | 6 | 13% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.